PEPC_P79640_nhpa_shoulder_hardening.doc
DOC document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mammoth Cave National Park - NP-MACA 13(1), 14(2) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-19-B-000002
About this file
PEPC_P79640_nhpa shoulder hardening
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results_of_Bid_-_NP-MACA_13(1),_14(2).ppt | PPT presentation | |
| NP-MACA_13(1),_14(2)_-_Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| FinalPaveMemo_ME.pdf | ||
| CE_MACA_13(1)_14(2).pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-MACA_13(1),_14(2).pdf | ||
| GreenRiverFerryCrossingUpdatedScope_SHPOResponse.pdf | ||
| FinalScourMemo.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form_-_2018.pdf | ||
| 2011_B_0388_final_FWS_concurrance.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-MACA_13(1),_14(2).pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_NP-MACA_13(1),_14(2).doc | DOC document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Normal
National Park Service
| U.S. Department of the Interior | |
| Mammoth Cave National Park |
Date: 06/12/2018
ASSESSMENT OF ACTIONS HAVING AN EFFECT ON HISTORIC PROPERTIES
A. DESCRIPTION OF UNDERTAKING
1. Park: Mammoth Cave National Park
2. Project Description:
Project Name: Replace and Harden the Unsafe Deteriorate Pavement Edge On The Mammoth Cave Parkway
Prepared by: Eddie Wells Date Prepared: 03/30/2018 Telephone: 270-758-2143
PEPC Project Number: 79640
Locations:
County, State: Edmonson, KY
District, Section: KY02, Describe project:
This project entails the removal, replacement, and hardening of the edge of the asphalt surfacing along 2,000 linear feet of the road surface along the Mammoth Cave Parkway.
The area removed and replaced will be a minimum of 24 inches wide.
Area of potential effects (as defined in 36 CFR 800.16[d])
Mammoth Cave Parkway (non-contiguous sections)
3. Has the area of potential effects been surveyed to identify historic properties?
| No | ||
| X | Yes | |
| Source or reference: |
4. Potentially Affected Resource(s):
Archeological Resources Affected: No
Historical Structures/Resources Affected: No
Cultural Landscapes Affected: No
Ethnographic Resources Affected: No
5. The proposed action will: (check as many as apply)
| No | Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure | |||
| No | Replace historic features/elements in kind | |||
| No | Add non-historic features/elements to a historic structure | |||
| No | Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) | |||
| No | Add non-historic features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape | |||
| No | Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible | |||
| No | Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible> | |||
| No | Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources | |||
| No | Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic features, terrain, | |||
| setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources | ||||
| No | Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) |
Other (please specify):
6. Supporting Study Data:
| (Attach if feasible; if action is in a plan, EA or EIS, give name and project |
| or page number.) |
The areas described in the narrative have been highly disturbed in the past: first by initial construction in the late- 1950's - early- 1960's, then by subsequent road maintenance efforts.
B. REVIEWS BY CULTURAL RESOURCE SPECIALISTS
The park 106 coordinator requested review by the park's cultural resource specialist/advisors as indicated by check-off boxes or as follows:
[ X ] 106 Advisor
Name: Beth Byrd
Date: 04/02/2018
| Comments: |
| Please see review of archeologist. |
Check if project does not involve ground disturbance [
Assessment of Effect:
No Potential to Cause Effect
No Historic Properties Affected
X
No Adverse Effect
Adverse Effect
X
Streamlined Review
Recommendations for conditions or stipulations:
Doc Method: Streamlined Review (PA)
Streamlined Activity:
3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas
[ X ] Archeologist
Name: John Cornelison
Date: 04/02/2018
Check if project does not involve ground disturbance [
Assessment of Effect:
No Potential to Cause Effect
No Historic Properties Affected
X
No Adverse Effect
Adverse Effect
X
Streamlined Review
Recommendations for conditions or stipulations: Previously disturbed
Doc Method: Streamlined Review (PA)
Streamlined Activity:
3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas
No Reviews From: Curator, Historical Architect, Historian, Other Advisor, Anthropologist, Historical Landscape Architect
C. PARK SECTION 106 COORDINATOR'S REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Assessment of Effect:
| No Potential to Cause Effects | ||
| X | No Historic Properties Affected | |
| No Adverse Effect | ||
| Adverse Effect |
2. Documentation Method:
] A. Standard 36 CFR Part 800 Consultation
Further consultation under 36 CFR Part 800 is needed.
X ] B. Streamlined Review Under the 2008 Servicewide Programmatic Agreement (PA)
The above action meets all conditions for a streamlined review under section III of the 2008 Servicewide PA for Section 106 compliance.
Applicable Streamlined Review Criteria
(Specify 1-16 of the list of streamlined review criteria.)
3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas.
] C. Undertaking Related to Park Specific or Another Agreement
| The proposed undertaking is covered for Section 106 purposes under another |
| document such as a park, region or statewide agreement established in accord with 36 CFR |
| 800.7 or 36 CFR 800.14. |
] D. Combined NEPA/NHPA Process
Process and documentation required for the preparation of an EA/FONSI or an EIS/ROD to comply with Section 106 is in accord with 36 CFR 800.8.c.
] E. Memo to Project File
3. Consultation Information
SHPO Required: No
SHPO Sent:
SHPO Received:
THPO Required:
THPO Sent:
THPO Received:
SHPO/THPO Notes:
Advisory Council Participating: No
Advisory Council Notes:
Additional Consulting Parties: No
4. Stipulations and Conditions:
| Following are listed any stipulations or conditions necessary to ensure that | |
| the assessment of effect above is consistent with 36 CFR Part 800 criteria of | |
| effect or to avoid or reduce potential adverse effects. |
| 5. Mitigations/Treatment Measures: | ||
| Measures to prevent or minimize loss or impairment of historic/prehistoric properties: | ||
| (Remember that setting, location, and use may be relevant.) |
No Assessment of Effect mitigations identified.
6. Assessment of Effect Notes:
D. RECOMMENDED BY PARK SECTION 106 COORDINATOR:
Compliance Specialist:
| NHPA Specialist | |
| Eddie Wells | Date: |
E. SUPERINTENDENT'S APPROVAL
The proposed work conforms to the NPS Management Policies and Cultural Resource Management Guideline, and I have reviewed and approve the recommendations, stipulations, or conditions noted in Section C of this form.
| Signature | |||
| Superintendent: | Date: | ||
| Barclay Trimble |
Assessment of Effect Form - Replace and Harden the Unsafe Deteriorate Pavement Edge On The Mammoth Cave Parkway - PEPC ID: 79640
| Page | |
| of |
File details come from the government source that posted it.