4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 242 KB Posted Jun 29, 2023

Attached to: CONSTRUCTION, REPLACE DECKING AT VC, BISC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: 140P5423R0022
Issued by: Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 20, 2023

This document is a past performance questionnaire for a federal construction contract opportunity with the National Park Service to replace decking at a visitor center in Biscayne National Park. The contractor is requesting a past performance reference from the recipient for a prior or current contract. The questionnaire asks the recipient to rate the contractor's performance, timeliness, quality of work, and overall performance on a previous contract using defined evaluation criteria. It also requests explanatory comments for responses and provides fields to identify the contract being rated, the contracting parties, and the questionnaire respondent's contact information. The completed questionnaire must be returned to the identified National Park Service contracting officer by July 31, 2023 to be considered as part of the contractor's proposal for the deck replacement project at Solicitation Number 140P5423R0022.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CONSTRUCTION, REPLACE DECKING AT VC, BISC, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
1_BISC_SOW_Replace_Decking_Visitor_Center.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2023
2_BISC_VC_and_HQ_Decking_Drawing_Details.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2023
3_WD_DBA_FL20230215_REV_4.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2023
Sol_140P5423R0022.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2023

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation No. 140P5423R0022

Please Complete this Questionnaire and Email to Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2

– South Contracting Office, Solicitation Number: 140P5423R0022 for the Redecking of the Visitor Center boardwalk located within B i s c a y n e National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency or company under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

This Questionnaire is due to Christian Sanabria no later than 04:00 PM EST on JULY 31, 2023. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.

If you will not be available on July 31, 2023, for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contracting Officer to contact.

Alternate POC:

Alternate POC Phone Number:

Alternate POC Email Address:

Thank you.

NAME OF OFFEROR:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

CURRENT OR HISTORICAL CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACT REFERENCED

Contract or Identifying Number:

Contract Value:

Period of Performance:

Brief Description:

Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency / Company:

Title:

Phone:

Email:

EVALUATION

Please rate the contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions: The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

5BEXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

0BVERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

1BSATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

2BMARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

3BUNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

4BNOT APPLICABLE

(N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.

Unable to provide assessment.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

QUESTION 1: PERFORMANCE

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

QUESTIONS 2 AND 3: TIMELINESS

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Comments, if any.

QUESTION 4: QUALITY OF WORK

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Quality of Shipments

Comments, if any.

QUESTION 5: OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

MARGINAL

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)

N/A

UNSATISFACTORY

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

EXCEPTIONAL

Alternate POC:

Alternate POC Phone Number:

Alternate POC Email Address:

NAME OF OFFEROR:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

Contract or Identifying Number:

Contract Value:

Period of Performance:

Brief Description:

Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency Company:

Title:

Phone:

Email:

ExceptionalPerformance:

Very GoodPerformance:

SatisfactoryPerformance:

MarginalPerformance:

UnsatisfactoryPerformance:

6BNAPerformance:

ExceptionalTimeliness:

Very GoodTimeliness:

SatisfactoryTimeliness:

MarginalTimeliness:

UnsatisfactoryTimeliness:

7BNATimeliness:

ExceptionalAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems:

Very GoodAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems:

SatisfactoryAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems:

MarginalAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems:

UnsatisfactoryAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems:

7BNAAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems:

ExceptionalQuality of Shipments:

Very GoodQuality of Shipments:

SatisfactoryQuality of Shipments:

MarginalQuality of Shipments:

UnsatisfactoryQuality of Shipments:

NAQuality of Shipments:

ExceptionalRow1:

Very GoodRow1:

SatisfactoryRow1:

MarginalRow1:

UnsatisfactoryRow1:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Jun 29, 2023.