36C26118Q0019-010.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Electrophysiology Physician Services On-Site Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C26118Q0019
About this file
36C26118Q0019 D.2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26118Q0019-012.pdf | ||
| 36C26118Q0019-008.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26118Q0019-011.pdf | ||
| 36C26118Q0019-009.pdf | ||
| 36C26118Q0019-007.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
D.2 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. The Contractor identified below has requested that you complete a past performance questionnaire on their behalf. This questionnaire will be used by the Contracting Officer identified in paragraph 6 to assess the likelihood that the Contractor will perform successfully on an impending requirement for the VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System (VASNHCS). Your prompt completion and return of this questionnaire is greatly appreciated.
CONTRACTOR NAME _________________________________________
REFERENCED CONTRACT # _________________________________________
2. Background. The VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System has a requirement for a Contractor to furnish all personnel to provide services necessary to perform onsite Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician Services to eligible beneficiaries of the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Reno, Nevada.
3. GENERAL INFORMATION: (Completed by Reference of Contractor being evaluated)
Name of Government or Commercial Organization:
Name of Person Completing Response: __________________________________________
Title: Phone E-mail:
Address of Record:
Contractor Performed as: |_|Prime Contractor |_|Sub-Contractor
Dollar Amount of contract identified in paragraph 1 above.
Dates of Performance (if current include expiration) ____________________________________
4. Please answer the following questions pertaining to the relevancy of the services provided to you as compared to the description in paragraph 2.
Q1. Did the Contractor provide onsite Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician Services for your Organizations (Y/N)? ___________ If yes, how many employees did they provide? ___________.
Q2. If no, please provide a short description of the type of services provided, the number, and to what department they were assigned.
5. Please use the below matrix to answer questions relating to performance using the following template.
Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation. If the rating is Excellent, Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
“E” = Excellent = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements
“G” = Good = Performance exceeded the contract requirements
“S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements
“M” = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements but some material aspects of the Contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory
“U” = Unsatisfactory = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements
Please write in “not applicable” or “neutral” if unable to rate a certain question. For any E, G, M, or U rating please provide a short summary explanation of rating.
| Please rate and provide information/comments for the following: |
| Circle one |
Q1. To what extent did the Contractor comply with overall contract requirements?
E G S M U
Q2. How successful was the Contractor in filling all required staff shifts?
E G S M U
Q3. How would you rate the quality of the Physician services provided by this Contractor in terms of technical competence, reliability, and demeanor with patients and staff.
E G S M U
Q4. To what extent was the Contractor able to meet unexpected and short notice changes and/or requirements (e.g. unexpected shift vacancies, training requirements).
E G S M U
Q5. How would you rate the Contractor’s administrative staff as pertains to communication with your organization’s key personnel, their ability to complete credentialing and privileging, billing and invoicing processes, and overall contract management?
E G S M U
Q6. Would you award another contract to the Contractor being evaluated? If no, please explain:
Yes No
Q7. Additional Comments pertaining to Contractor performance:
Printed Name & Signature of Evaluator
Date
6. Thank you for your time. Please return this completed questionnaire to Nandini Johnson at Nandini.johnson@va.gov no later than January 8, 2018, 12:00pm PST.
File details come from the government source that posted it.