RFIs.pdf
PDF 208 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Y1DA--New-Demo/Replacement of Windows Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25720Q0457
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25720Q0457 0001.pdf | ||
| 36C25720Q0457.pdf | ||
| WD McLennan - Waco.pdf | ||
| 36C25720Q0457-012.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI’s 36C25720Q0457 Building 6 Historical Design Window Demo/Replacement
1. Is the window over the rectangle double doors included in the replacement.
Yes
2. Is the TX historical commission involved in the project.
No
3. Is it possible to receive as-builts for the windows.
No
4. Can the windows be single frame non-functional with the appearance of a double hung window.
Yes
5. Section 4.3 52.211-10 COMMENCENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984) ALTERNATE I (APR 1984): (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 30 days after Notice to Proceed. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises: Will time be permitted for ordering and manufacturing windows prior aside the 30 days after NTP?
Yes, time can be extended and there will be an allotted time to order the window with proving lead time.
6. Will you be requiring a full packet or Just a Proposal with Scope of Work and Schedule of Value?
We will need a full packet with the itemized break down of the bid to coincide with the SOW with Schedules of Values.
7. Any pictures/drawings that define the specific scope?
No
8. The seven (7ea.) windows to be removed, are to be replaced by “New-Replica” or to be removed by New Modern Windows?
New Replica
a. If new Modern Window, is there any specs for the desired window?
9. Please confirm the following interpretation;
a. One (1ea.) door with frame will be required to be preserved to be installed at Building 6. This job is to assume the requirement to retrofit opening in Building 6 for door installation.
No specs for the desired window.
10. In the current situation can we get on site to see the windows and door? Do we have access to plans?
Yes
Additional Questions
1. Under the FAR 52.204-22 provision. Can the Offeror submit alternate window design that match adjacent bunding design?
a. The existent design. To match radio of curvature makes the window highly difficult and costly to fabricate to the point that could exceed the range of the solicitations. No the windows must match the existing windows for bldg. 6.
b. Would the Government consider the option of Aluminum frame in-lieu of wooden frame to match new window system and extend durability of frame. Yes, aluminum or vinyl is acceptable.
2. General Liability Coverage limits. Is $1M coverage acceptable? 1 million is acceptable.
3. Would the City require any specific permit and/or payable fee? No, the City of Waco will not require any specific permits and/ or payable fees.
4. Is there any recycling ordinance or specific requirement? No, there is no recycling ordinances or specific requirements.
Yes, the windows will be sitting on opening smooth stone. A peal stick will be okay as long as it’s still a water proof barrier to prevent any moisture form sipping back into the building.
4&5. No different type was intended.
5.5. Oak would be the prefer wood used that is this pressure treated with water and insect repellent.
4.3,c Either one is fine for the windows Aluminum or vinyl and fabrication lead times will be taken into consideration.
21. 4.5, a Contract time can be extended as needed with allotted time to fabricate a custom window because of the COVID-19 Pandemic and this will be taken into consideration when contract is awarded and coordinate with the COR.
Please see RFQ 36C25720Q0457 Building 6 Historical Design Window Demo/Replacement for appropriate clauses.
Please submit payment and Performance Bond. A Conditional Waiver will not be accepted.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .