36C25018R0453-005.pdf
PDF 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Interventional Radiology Services - Dayton VAMC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25018R0453
About this file
36C25018R0453 Attachment 4 - Past Performance Survey.pdf
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25018R0453-00001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25018R0453-002.pdf | ||
| 36C25018R0453-006.pdf | ||
| 36C25018R0453-007.pdf | ||
| 36C25018R0453-004.pdf | ||
| 36C25018R0453-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25018R0453-003.pdf | ||
| 36C25018R0453-000.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4: PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY RFP: 36C25018R0453
Offeror’s Name: ___________________________________________________
Contract Number: __________________________________________________
Contract Type and Dollar Value: _______________________________________
Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________________________________________
“O” =Outstanding = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements “A” =Above Average = Performance exceeded the contract requirements “S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements “M” = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements, but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory “U” = Unacceptable = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements Please rate and provide information and detailed comments for the following: Circle one
1. To what extent did the contractor comply with contract requirements? O A S M U
2. If reports were required, were they accurate in meeting contract requirements? O A S M U
3. To what extent did the contractor use appropriate personnel for contract requirements? O A S M U
4. To what extent did the contractor display technical expertise? O A S M U
5. To what extent was contractor able to meet the performance schedule? O A S M U
6. To what extent was contractor flexible in responding to changing needs? O A S M U
7. To what extent was the contractor reliable? O A S M U
8. To what extent was the contractor responsive to technical directions? O A S M U
Your assistance is requested by Alexander J. Daniel, Contracting Officer (CO) to assist with establishing the performance history for the Company (Offeror) named above. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, please email the complete past performance questionnaire(s) to:
alexander.daniel@va.gov and karen.williams@va.gov.
9. To what extent did contractor notify you of problems or potential problems? O A S M U
10. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain.
Yes No
11. Would you award another contract to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain:
12. Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain:
Additional Comments:
Name of Evaluator:________________________________________________
Signature of Evaluator:_____________________________________________
Title:____________________________________________________________
Company:________________________________________________________
Telephone No.:____________________________________________________
Date:____________ mailto:alexander.daniel@va.gov mailto:karen.williams@va.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it.