36C25018R0453-005.pdf

PDF 38 KB Posted

Attached to
Interventional Radiology Services - Dayton VAMC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C25018R0453
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 10

About this file

36C25018R0453 Attachment 4 - Past Performance Survey.pdf

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Interventional Radiology Services - Dayton VAMC, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C25018R0453-00001000.docx DOCX document
36C25018R0453-002.pdf PDF
36C25018R0453-006.pdf PDF
36C25018R0453-007.pdf PDF
36C25018R0453-004.pdf PDF
36C25018R0453-001.docx DOCX document
36C25018R0453-003.pdf PDF
36C25018R0453-000.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 4: PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY RFP: 36C25018R0453

Offeror’s Name: ___________________________________________________

Contract Number: __________________________________________________

Contract Type and Dollar Value: _______________________________________

Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________________________________________

“O” =Outstanding = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements “A” =Above Average = Performance exceeded the contract requirements “S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements “M” = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements, but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory “U” = Unacceptable = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements Please rate and provide information and detailed comments for the following: Circle one

1. To what extent did the contractor comply with contract requirements? O A S M U

2. If reports were required, were they accurate in meeting contract requirements? O A S M U

3. To what extent did the contractor use appropriate personnel for contract requirements? O A S M U

4. To what extent did the contractor display technical expertise? O A S M U

5. To what extent was contractor able to meet the performance schedule? O A S M U

6. To what extent was contractor flexible in responding to changing needs? O A S M U

7. To what extent was the contractor reliable? O A S M U

8. To what extent was the contractor responsive to technical directions? O A S M U

Your assistance is requested by Alexander J. Daniel, Contracting Officer (CO) to assist with establishing the performance history for the Company (Offeror) named above. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, please email the complete past performance questionnaire(s) to:

alexander.daniel@va.gov and karen.williams@va.gov.

9. To what extent did contractor notify you of problems or potential problems? O A S M U

10. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain.

Yes No

11. Would you award another contract to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain:

12. Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain:

Additional Comments:

Name of Evaluator:________________________________________________

Signature of Evaluator:_____________________________________________

Title:____________________________________________________________

Company:________________________________________________________

Telephone No.:____________________________________________________

Date:____________ mailto:alexander.daniel@va.gov mailto:karen.williams@va.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it.