RFP_283-15-0458_Attach_15-16_Client_Letter_ _Past_Performance.pdf
PDF 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 283-15-0458
About this file
RFP 283-15-0458 Attach 15-16 Client Letter Past Performance
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP_283-15-0458_Attach_1-3_SOW _QASP _Deliverables.pdf | ||
| RFP_283-15-0458_Attach_13_IT_Worksheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| RFP_283-15-0458_Attach_14_SubK_Plan_Format.pdf | ||
| RFP_283-15-0458_SAMHDA.pdf | ||
| RFP_283-15-0458_Attach_4-12.pdf | ||
| RFP_283-15-0458_Attach_17_Summary_of_Cost_and_Hours_Spreadsheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP No. 283-15-0458 Attachment 15
CLIENT LETTER
(Suggested Format)
Subject: RFP No. 283-15-0458
Dear {Insert Client}:
We are currently responding to the Department of Health & Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, for the procurement of a contract entitled, “Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive
(SAMHDA).”
The Government is placing increased emphasis in its procurements on past performance as a source selection factor.
It requires that clients of entities responding to solicitations be identified and their participation in the evaluation process be requested.
Based on your knowledge concerning our work, it is requested that you please complete the attached “Contractor Performance Information” form and forward it to the following address by no later than ________________.
Craig Sager, Contract Specialist 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 7-1051 Rockville, MD 20857 Ref.: RFP 283-15-0458
Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to: .
Sincerely, {Insert Offeror}
Attachment 15
DHHS, SAMHSA: Final ___ Interim___ Report
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Contractor Name and Address (Identify Division)
1. Contract Number:
2. Type of Contract:
3. Contract Value (Current plus any unexercised options):
(Please correct the above as needed.)
4. Period of Performance (including any option periods):
5. Description of Requirement:
6. Ratings. Summarize contractor performance and circle or type in the number below that corresponds to the performance rating for each category. Please see the attachment, which explains the rating scale.
Quality:
Comments:
Cost Control:
Timeliness:
Business Relations:
Customer Service:
7. Total score:
Evaluated by:
Agency/Organization ______________________________________________Date ____________
Name and Title _________________________________________Telephone number ____________
Signature _____________________________________________ E-mail address _______________________
Attachment 16
Contractor Performance Evaluation Instructions for Completing Contractor Performance Information Form
Based on the rating area elements presented below and the rating guidelines on the back of this sheet, please evaluate contractor performance in each of the rating areas. On the “Contractor Performance Information” form, circle (or type in the “Comments” area) the rating from 0 to 4 that most closely matches your evaluation of the contractor’s performance. Please add written comments for each rating. If you wish, you may attach additional comments or information. We would also appreciate your answers to the specific questions, if any, on the back of the form. Please return the form to the address indicated on the back of the form. Thank you for your time and your cooperation.
SAMHSA will use the information from this form to evaluate offerors competing for contract awards. We may release the information from this form to the contractor during negotiations or debriefings. If we release information from this form, we will not release your name to the contractor.
Elements within Each Rating Area
Quality of Product or Service
- Compliance with contract requirements
- Accuracy of reports
- Appropriateness of personnel
- Technical excellence
Cost Control
- Within budget
- Current, accurate and complete billings
- Costs properly allocated
- Unallowable costs not billed
- Relationship of negotiated costs to actual
- Cost efficiencies
Timeliness of Performance
- Meets interim milestones
- Reliable
- Stays on schedule despite problems
- Responsive to technical direction
- Completes work on time, including wrap-up and contract administration
- No liquidated damages assessed
Business Relations
- Effective management
- Use of performance-based management techniques
- Business-like concern for the customer's interests
- Effective management and selection of subcontractors
- Effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program
- Reasonable/cooperative behavior
- Effective use of technology in management and communication
- Flexible
- Minimal staff turnover
- Maintains high employee morale
- Resolves disagreements without being unnecessarily litigious.
Customer Service
- Understands and embraces service and program goals
- Team approach with the customer
- Satisfaction of end users with the contractor’s service
- Positive customer feedback
- Prompt responses
- Courteous interactions
- Effective escalations and referrals
- Initiative and proactive improvements
- Creative service strategies
Rating Guidelines
Quality of Product or Service:
0 - Unsatisfactory
Nonconformance jeopardizes the achievement of contract goals; default.
1 - Poor Nonconformance requires major agency intervention to ensure achievement of contract goals; show cause or cure notices.
2 - Fair Quality meets specifications in most cases, however, some agency intervention required to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
3 - Good Quality meets specifications in all cases.
4 - Excellent Quality exceeds specifications in some cases.
Cost Control:
0 - Unsatisfactory Cost increases jeopardize achievement of contract goals; or billings routinely include unallowable costs.
1 - Poor Significant cost increases; or some inaccurate billings including some with unallowable costs.
2 - Fair Minor cost increases; or some inaccurate billings, but a minimal (1-2) number with unallowable costs.
3 - Good Contractor performed within costs; but some late billings, none with unallowable costs.
4 - Excellent Costs were less than the amount cited in the contract; and billings accurate and timely.
Timeliness of Performance:
0 - Unsatisfactory Delays jeopardize the achievement of contract goals.
1 - Poor Other significant delays.
2 - Fair Minor delays.
3 - Good All deliverables on time.
4 - Excellent All deliverables on time with some ahead of schedule; or stays on schedule despite unforeseen circumstances.
Business Relations:
0 - Unsatisfactory Unethical or illegal business practices.
1 - Poor Business practices are not attuned to customer support.
2 - Fair Business practices are somewhat attuned to customer support.
3 - Good Business practices focus on customer support.
4 - Excellent
Customer Service:
Highly effective, proactive business practices focused on customer support.
0 - Unsatisfactory Response to service requests is routinely late, ineffective, or rude; customers express frustration or anger about many interactions; complaints are unresolved; contractor seems unaware of service issues.
1 - Poor Response to service requests is often late, ineffective or rude; some complaints are resolved.
2 -Fair Response to service requests is uneven in timing or effectiveness; customer interactions are tenuous; contractor is trying hard and understands service issues.
3 - Good Response to service requests is timely, effective and courteous; customers express positive feedback; delivery of service is smooth and organized; collects customer feedback; customer problems are resolved well.
4 - Excellent Response to service requests is timely, effective and courteous; the contractor is proactive in building good relations with customers, proposing new service strategies, analyzing and reporting on service loads and collecting and using customer feedback.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .