06_-_SF_1009_WMATA.pdf

PDF 199 KB Posted

Attached to
WMATA SmartBenefits Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
2032K818P00001
Issued by
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service

About this file

Sole source justification document.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

SF 1009 - FAR 13.106-1(b) SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FOR

ACQUISITIONS AT OR BELOW THE SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD

Treasury Standard Form – 1009 (Rev 10/17)

Prescribed by Treasury: DTAP 1013.106(b)

1. Identification of the requesting activity and contracting activity.

Treasury Office of Technical Assistance IRS Office of Treasury Procurement Services 2.a A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs.

Transit subsidy benefits (WMATA SmartBenefits) for Treasury Office of Technical Assistance (OTA) Washington office personal service contractor (PSC) staff. The anticipated period of performance is April 3, 2018 through April 2, 2019, with two subsequent option years ending April 2, 2021.

2.b Name and business size of the vendor. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority other than small business.

2.c Requisition No. 18PR-OTA-0363

3. IGCE/Estimated dollar value.

Base Year: $30,000 + $19,320 option quantity = $49,320 Option Period 1: $30,000 + $19,320 option quantity = $49,320 Option Period 2: $30,000 + $19,320 option quantity = $49,320 Total: $147,960

4.a Identification of the circumstances that preclude competition (Check the appropriate box that applies).

Urgency Exclusive licensing agreements Brand-name Industrial mobilization.

Other Only one reasonable source.

4.b Supporting information and facts (i.e. the details surrounding the requirement that supports the selection made in 4.a).

WMATA is the proprietary provider of the SmartBenefits commuter program for all Federal workers participating in the Transit Benefit Program in the National Capital Region that use Metrorail, Metro buses, and Metro van pools. There is no other public transportation provider with a system as wide-spread as the SmartBenefits program in the National Capital Region.

5. Any other important information.

Market research confirmed there are no other public transportation providers that serve a large portion of the National Capital Region.

6. Certifications and Approvals.

6.a Program Office certification (Requiring Activity). I hereby certify that the supporting information and data provided and which form the basis for this justification are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Name: Kenneth Hanson Date: 30 March 2018

Signature:

Prescribed by Treasury: DTAP 1013.106(b)

6.b Small Business Specialist determination (Contracting Activity) (applicable only if the criteria in DTAP 1004.70 is met). I have reviewed this justification, including any attached documentation and concur / do not concur.

Name: Date:

6.c Contracting Officer approval. In accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b)(1), as a warranted contracting officer, I hereby determine that the circumstances of the acquisition make only one brand-name or source reasonably available for the reasons provided above; therefore precluding competition and supporting the Government’s determination to solicit as a brand-name requirement or solicit and award to the vendor stated in section 2.b.

Name: Aleta Dust Date:

711NB

Stamp

711NB

Typewritten Text LaTonya D. Bowman

711NB

Typewritten Text 4/17/2018

Prescribed by Treasury: DTAP 1013.106(b)

Instructions for SF 1009 - FAR 13.106-1(b) Sole Source Justification for Acquisitions at or below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold

I. General instructions. Each Sole source justifications for acquisitions at or below the SAT shall contain sufficient information and data to justify the proposed action, thereby be able to stand on its own. This type of detail is critical in order to enable a reviewer and/or approver to clearly understand the requirement and the rationale supporting the justification. Simply copying and pasting information from a vendor’s website or marketing literature fails to support the use of such justification. Market research performed by the Requiring Activity and Contracting Activity should be used to support this document.

Given the majority of the information and data necessary to support this type of action resides with the Requiring Activity, they are the primary party responsible for completing this form.

However, the Requiring Activity shall seek assistance and input from the Contracting Activity/Contracting Officer (preferably in advance of submission of the procurement request).

It is also recommended the justification is not signed by the Requiring Activity until such time the Contracting Officer has had an opportunity to review, make necessary revisions and to include other necessary information or data to support the justification.

For Brand-name acquisitions keep in mind the justification is to cover only the portion of the acquisition which is brand-name and that that the document approval requirements only apply to that portion. However, it does not mean that details regarding the overarching requirement (i.e.

in the instance where the brand name is only a portion of an overall requirement) aren’t to be included in the document.

In the event of conflict between this form and applicable regulatory coverage (i.e. FAR and DTAR), the more stringent requirement shall be followed.

If the requirement involves classified or sensitive information, ensure the proper steps are taken to protect the information (e.g. marking).

Prior to distribution for signature: (i) delete all green text (which are examples), and (ii) consider converting the document to .pdf to support electronic signature and ease of retention.

The fields within this form are fluid and will change based upon input, therefore individuals completing this form need to be mindful of formatting prior to converting the document to pdf and submitting it for signature.

II. Field specific instructions.

Section 1. Identification of the requiring activity and the contracting activity. Provide the name of the requiring activity (e.g. BFS’ –IT Office) and the name of the contracting activity (e.g. BFS’s – Contracting Office for IT).

Prescribed by Treasury: DTAP 1013.106(b)

Section 2.a A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs.

Provide a clear, concise description of the supplies or services to be procured. Include a statement regarding the delivery schedule and/or the period of performance, inclusive of all option periods and award terms. State the schedule and associated schedule category(ies) the supplies or services are being procured against. For supplies, include details such quantity and a brief description of the items (e.g. twelve (12) laptops).

For brand name, provide the name of the brand, model number and other specific details associated with the brand name item(s) to be procured; name(s) of known sources that can provide the brand name.

For modification describe the purpose of modification, including details such as proposed extension to the period of performance as well as the purpose of and type of the contract.

Section 2.b Name and business size of vendor. If applicable, insert the name of proposed vendor and the vendor’s business size (large or small business) to support whether 6.b is required. Vendor information can be obtained from the SAM database. If not applicable, enter “Not applicable”.

Section 2.c Requisition Number. If known, include the requisition number. If not applicable, enter “Not applicable”.

Section 3 IGCE/Estimated dollar value. Provide the IGCE/estimated dollar value of the anticipated award, inclusive of all options, award terms and any other monetary incentives.

For brand name provide the IGCE/estimated dollar value of the portion of the proposed acquisition, inclusive of all options, award terms and other monetary incentives, that is for the brand name item and the full IGCE/estimated dollar value of the acquisition.

For modifications provide the IGCE/estimated dollar value of the modification and the current total dollar value of the contract.

Section 4.a Identification of the circumstances that preclude competition. Check the applicable circumstance of the action that deems only one source reasonably available (see FAR 13.106-1(b)).

Section 4.b Supporting information and facts (i.e. the details surrounding the requirement that supports the selection made in 4.a). The rationale for the sole source must be thoroughly explained within this section. For example, explain why the vendor is the only one that can provide the product or service if using only one source (e.g. urgency, industrial mobilization, a patent, copyright, proprietary data, or exclusive licensing agreement). If urgency, explain what harm, monetary or schedule wise, (and include dollars that would be lost, time lost, etc.) that will result if an aware is not made to this vendor by a certain date.

Prescribed by Treasury: DTAP 1013.106(b)

For brand name, provide sufficient detail to describe the rationale for the brand name. For example, Why is this particular brand name needed? Why won’t another brand of product work?

For modifications explain why the modification is needed, the circumstances that support the modification, etc.

Section 5 Additional important information. Include, as applicable, any other important information that supports the justification. Note: If a market research summary report (e.g. SF 1010) was completed, this might be a good place to provide a summary of the findings/ determination along with a citation to that document so that a reviewer can refer to that document for greater detail.

Section 6 Certifications/Approvals. Obtain the signatures as indicated.

A supplemental justification is required if any of the following revisions occur between the approval of the original justification and the covered award or modification of the contract: an increase in dollar value beyond the authority approved in the justification; a change in the competitive strategy that further reduces competition; or any type of change in the requirement that affects the basis of the justification.

2018-03-30T15:06:34-0400
Kenneth W. Hanson Jr.
2018-03-30T15:48:18-0400
Aleta J. Dust
2018-04-17T12:10:56-0400
711NB

File details come from the government source that posted it.