PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE(sculpture)_Final_Draft.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Sculpture Conservation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 17-005488
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Soliciation # 17-005488
Please complete this Questionnaire and email to Christopher Lauver, Contract Specialist Email: christopher.lauver@nih.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for Solicitation Number 17-005488. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance in therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and email to Contract Specialist, Christopher Lauver.
email: christopher.lauver@nih.gov
POC name:_____________________________________________________________________
POC phone number:_____________________________________________________________
POC e-mail address:_____________________________________________________________
If you will not be available for verification of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the Contracting Officer to contact.
Alternate POC name:_____________________________________________________________
Alernate POC phone number:______________________________________________________
Alternate POC e-mail address:_____________________________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number:___________________________________________
2. Contract Value:________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance:__________________________________________________
4. Brief Description of Products/Services Provided: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:_________________________________ Agency/Company: _____________________________________________________ Title:______________________________Phone:_____________________________
II. Evaluation. Please rate the Contractor using the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
| Evaluation Definitions: |
| The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance. |
| Very Good |
| Performance EXCEEDS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contained minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| Satifactory |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contained minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were effective. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contained serious problems, issues or concerns; for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
Past Performance Evaluation
a. Performance
i. What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements in the following areas?
1. Evidence of conservation management efforts of similar large scale, outdoor sculptures.
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance (1)
2. Evidence in executing the cleaning and painting of similar large scale, outdoor sculptures.
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance (2)
b. Technical Approach
i. What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements in the following areas?
1. Paint/finish materials quality
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical (1)
2. Conservation activities
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical (2)
3. Project timeline adherence
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical (3)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .