Amendment_1_ILS_USTC_16-0003-1.pdf

6A NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

(Signature of Contracting Officer) (Signature of person authorized to sign)

Stephanie A. Servoss, Clerk of the Court

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

I

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09/26/2016 4, REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (ff other than Item 6) CODE

United States Tax Court 400 Second Street, NW Washington, DC 20217

8, NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county. State and ZIP Cede) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

16-0003-1 „

/K. 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09/20/2016

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE I FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers I I is extended, I XI is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation eras amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items Band 15. and returning copies of the amendment: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letterer telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12, ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

LI

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

LI

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, 1-1 is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The Solicitation is amended to incorporate the attached questions and answers.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Previous edition unusable Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

ILS with Digital Repository and Discovery Overlay Solicitation Q & A September 26, 2016

Ql. Are organizations outside the United States eligible to bid on this solicitation?

Al: This is a best value solicitation and all responsible offerors eligible to do business with the United States government may bid.

Q2. How many simultaneous users does the Library need?

A2. Currently the Library has 4 staff that will need to use the product simultaneously. However, we may need add one additional user in the future.

Q3. Does the Library want more than just the catalog data converted from SIMA Camelot?

A3. The Library would like the SIMA Camelot Catalog data to be converted. The Library would also be interested in the conversion of other data, such as SIMA Camelot's Serials data with check-in information, and circulation data from our 3M RFID software, if possible.

Q4. How much digital data storage does the Library anticipate in Year One?

A4. The Library anticipates that it will need more than 1GB of digital data storage, as a large-scale digitization project is forthcoming.

Q5. What external databases does the Library plan to federate?

A5. Currently, the Library would be interested in having approximately six external databases connected, but this number may be subject to change.

Q6. Are any of the external databases provided by Ebsco?

Q6. None of the external databases we would be interested in connecting are provided by Ebsco.

Q7. Does the Library want EOS to load data from OCLC or does the Library staff plan to do that activity?

A7. The Library would like the vendor to load data from OCLC into the new system if doing so would be cost-effective.

Q8. Are there authority files that also need to be converted in addition to the catalog data for see and see also cross references and unlinked authority records?

A8. There are not any authority files that will need to be converted or loaded for migration to a new system.

Q9. Is the Library planning to do a retrospective conversion for RDA/uncatalogued records?

A9. No, the Library is not planning on doing a retrospective conversion project of records to RDA. The majority of the Library's OCLC holdings, which will be loaded into the new system by the vendor, have already been converted to

RDA.

Q10. Would you consider proposals for just the Digital Archive/Repository portion of this RFP?

A10. At this time, the Library is looking for a comprehensive solution.