Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- REPLACE GUARDRAILS AND HANDRAILS, BISCAYNE NP Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P5420R0006
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P5420R0006.pdf | ||
| BISC Guardrail Replacement SOW.pdf | ||
| Railing Replacement Photos.pdf | ||
| Davis-Bacon Act WD # FL20200215.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5420R0006
Please Complete this Questionnaire and E-mail to Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 – South Contracting Office, Solicitation Number: 140P5420R0006 for the Removal/Installation of Guardrails and Handrails located at Biscayne National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please Complete this Questionnaire and E-mail to the Contract Specialist at: Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov
This Questionnaire is due to Christian Sanabria no later than 1:00 PM EST on 13 March 2020. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist from a corporate or government email account.
If you will not be available on 13 March 2020 for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contract Specialist to contact.
Alternate POC name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC Phone Number: ________________________________________
Alternate POC E-mail Address: ________________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR: ________________________________________________________________________
Phone: ________________________ Fax: _____________________________
E-Mail: ___________________________________________________________
I. CURRENT OR HISTORICAL CONTRACT INFORMATION
CONTRACT REFERENCED
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ______________________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: ___________________________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: _____________________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided:____________________________________________________________
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________ mailto:Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov mailto:Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov
Agency/Company: ____________________________________________________________________________
Title: ________________________________________ Phone: _______________________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR UTILIZING THE GUIDE BELOW.
EXPLANATORY NARRATIVES FOR AS MANY RESPONSES AS POSSIBLE WOULD BE
APPRECIATED. THESE NARRATIVES NEED NOT BE LENGTHY, JUST DETAILED. ATTACH
ADDITIONAL PAGES IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE
(N/A)
Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
QUESTION 1: PERFORMANCE
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
QUESTIONS 2 AND 3: TIMELINESS
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
QUESTION 4: QUALITY OF WORK
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Evaluation Definitions |
| Evaluation Definitions |
| The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance. |
| The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance. |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .