Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 63 KB Posted

Attached to
REPLACE GUARDRAILS AND HANDRAILS, BISCAYNE NP Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P5420R0006
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to REPLACE GUARDRAILS AND HANDRAILS, BISCAYNE NP, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140P5420R0006.pdf PDF
BISC Guardrail Replacement SOW.pdf PDF
Railing Replacement Photos.pdf PDF
Davis-Bacon Act WD # FL20200215.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation# 140P5420R0006

Please Complete this Questionnaire and E-mail to Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 – South Contracting Office, Solicitation Number: 140P5420R0006 for the Removal/Installation of Guardrails and Handrails located at Biscayne National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Please Complete this Questionnaire and E-mail to the Contract Specialist at: Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov

This Questionnaire is due to Christian Sanabria no later than 1:00 PM EST on 13 March 2020. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist from a corporate or government email account.

If you will not be available on 13 March 2020 for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contract Specialist to contact.

Alternate POC name: ________________________________________

Alternate POC Phone Number: ________________________________________

Alternate POC E-mail Address: ________________________________________

Thank you.

NAME OF OFFEROR: ________________________________________________________________________

Phone: ________________________ Fax: _____________________________

E-Mail: ___________________________________________________________

I. CURRENT OR HISTORICAL CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACT REFERENCED

1. Contract or Identifying Number: ______________________________________________________________

2. Contract Value: ___________________________________________________________________________

3. Period of Performance: _____________________________________________________________________

4. Brief description of items provided:____________________________________________________________

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________ mailto:Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov mailto:Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov

Agency/Company: ____________________________________________________________________________

Title: ________________________________________ Phone: _______________________________________

E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________________________

II. EVALUATION. PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR UTILIZING THE GUIDE BELOW.

EXPLANATORY NARRATIVES FOR AS MANY RESPONSES AS POSSIBLE WOULD BE

APPRECIATED. THESE NARRATIVES NEED NOT BE LENGTHY, JUST DETAILED. ATTACH

ADDITIONAL PAGES IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED.

Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE

(N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

QUESTION 1: PERFORMANCE

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

QUESTIONS 2 AND 3: TIMELINESS

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

QUESTION 4: QUALITY OF WORK

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Quality of Shipments

Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

Evaluation Definitions
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
N/A
N/A

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .