13. BNJ_redacted.pdf
PDF 323 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Steelcase Panel System Furniture Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6426724Q0179
About this file
This document is a Brand Name/Sole Source Justification for a federal contract opportunity. The justification is for the procurement of specific Steelcase panel system furniture items that must be compatible with existing installed systems. The rationale for the sole source justification includes the need for compatibility, proprietary data/patent limitations, and these items being direct replacements for existing equipment. The federal contract opportunity is a combined synopsis/solicitation for the Steelcase panel system furniture, which is an all-or-none requirement. Quotes are due by the response date and must be submitted electronically. The solicitation will be awarded to the responsible offeror whose quote conforms to the requirements and is most advantageous to the Government based on the evaluation criteria.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 14. Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| 7. Floor Plan (revised).pdf | ||
| 7. Floor Plan.pdf | ||
| 14. Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| 14. Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| 13. Combined Synopsis & Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRAND NAME/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION (SAM) SAT
LIMITED-SOURCES JUSTIFICATION (GSA) SAT
JUSTIFICATION FOR AN EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY
(ID/IQ TASK ORDER/DELIVERY ORDER) SAT
1. Description of Supplies/Services.
Item Part Number Description Brand
Qty
ITEMS BELOW FOR B508 - Room 119
2. Regulatory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition
SAM
GSA
ID/IQ Task Order/Delivery Order (e.g. NASA SEWP or ARMY CHESS) e.g.
simplified acquisition threshold contracting officers may full and open competition shall
3. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Regulatory Authority.
a.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 Must Be Compatible In All Aspects (Form, Fit And Function) With Existing Systems Presently Installed.
b.) A Patent, Copyright, or Proprietary Data Limits Competition.
c.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 are “Direct Replacements” Parts/Components for Existing Equipment.
d.) Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Supported By A Case Letter.
e.) Unusual and Compelling Urgency.
f.) Other: If required, discuss any other rationale that supports the use of a brand name/sole source for this effort.
4. Implication of Procuring Another Brand/Manufacturer a.) Unacceptable Delays in Fulfilling the Agency’s Requirements b.) Substantial Duplication Of Cost To The Government That Is Not Expected To Be Recovered Through Competition c.) Other: If required, discuss any other implication of procuring another brand/manufacturer.
5. Actions to Remove Barriers to Competition.
CERTIFICATION
CUSTOMER:
APPROVALS
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR/SPECIALIST:
CONTRACTING OFFICER:
CONLON.GRAHAM.MALACHA. Digitally signed by CONLON.GRAHAM.MALACHA.
Date: 2024.05.29 18:40:25 -07'00'
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .