RFI Official Responses - 2.pdf
PDF 117 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 127EAW23R0039 - Inyo Quarters Windows Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 127EAW23R0039
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A00002 - RFIs Round 2.pdf | ||
| Crestview Photos.pdf | ||
| A00001 -Due Date Correction and RFIs.pdf | ||
| 4. Fire Plan.pdf | ||
| 1. Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| 127EAW23R0039 - Inyo Quarters Windows Replacement.pdf | ||
| 5. Davis-Bacon Act WD CA20230020.pdf | ||
| 2. Schedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3. Project Maps and Pictures.pdf | ||
| 6. RFI Form.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) OFFICIAL RESPONSES
127EAW23R0039 - Inyo Quarters Windows Replacement
RFI responses will be responded to as necessary in amendment format which will be posted to the solicitation via beta.SAM.gov
Telephone requests for information will not be accepted or returned.
RFI #1 – On page 10 452.237-74 Key Personnel (FEB 1988) can the project superintendent be the quality control manager and safety individual?
USFS Response – Yes, that is acceptable so long as the awardee adheres to FAR clause 52.236-6
- Superintendence by the Contractor
RFI #2 – 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee (SEP 1996) per paragraph {c} the bid bond a 20% is required.
However, the solicitation is budgeted at $250,000. Please clarify which amount we need to provide bid bond for?
USFS Response – Bid bonds must adhere to the proposed amount including options. See table included in 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee (SEP 1996)
RFI #3 – Can we provide retrofit windows in lieu of new construction?
USFS Response – Yes, retrofit windows are acceptable so long as all specs are met.
RFI #4 – Do you require a specific name brand window or can a non recognize manufacture be submitted as long as the specifications are met?
USFS Response – A non-recognized manufacturer (US), is acceptable, if the specifications are met.
RFI #5 – The SF 1442 lists the due date and time as 06/21/2023 at 1300 PST, but on the description page of Sam.gov (https://sam.gov/opp/48572cac6e524825beccdb5b449b8995/view), has different dates. The dates below are listed:
USFS Response – Proposal due date and time are confirmed as 06/21/2023 at 1300 PST.
RFI #6 – During the job visit at the Mammoth Barracks we pinpointed 5 holes on the siding.
Please confirm we will not be responsible for filling these holes?
USFS Response – Contractor will not be responsible for fixing the holes in the siding.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFI #7 – We understand the ranger station windows are optional. We need clarification as we noticed two of the windows in the first-floor look like they are already vinyl meeting title 24.
Would these windows be replace too to match finish other windows?
USFS Response – The two existing windows that meet title 24, will not have to be replaced if they match the new replacement windows to installed in other areas.
RFI #8 – We noticed the siding on the range station is loose and broken in some areas. Please confirm we are not responsible for the repairs?
USFS Response – Contractor will not be responsible for repairing the loose siding.
RFI #9 – We were not be able to visit Crestview due to road closure, please provide photos?
USFS Response – See attached photos.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .