RFI Official Responses - 2.pdf

PDF 117 KB Posted

Attached to
127EAW23R0039 - Inyo Quarters Windows Replacement Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
127EAW23R0039
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 127EAW23R0039 - Inyo Quarters Windows Replacement, newest first.
File Type Posted
A00002 - RFIs Round 2.pdf PDF
Crestview Photos.pdf PDF
A00001 -Due Date Correction and RFIs.pdf PDF
4. Fire Plan.pdf PDF
1. Statement of Work.pdf PDF
127EAW23R0039 - Inyo Quarters Windows Replacement.pdf PDF
5. Davis-Bacon Act WD CA20230020.pdf PDF
2. Schedule.docx DOCX document
3. Project Maps and Pictures.pdf PDF
6. RFI Form.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) OFFICIAL RESPONSES

127EAW23R0039 - Inyo Quarters Windows Replacement

RFI responses will be responded to as necessary in amendment format which will be posted to the solicitation via beta.SAM.gov

Telephone requests for information will not be accepted or returned.

RFI #1 – On page 10 452.237-74 Key Personnel (FEB 1988) can the project superintendent be the quality control manager and safety individual?

USFS Response – Yes, that is acceptable so long as the awardee adheres to FAR clause 52.236-6

- Superintendence by the Contractor

RFI #2 – 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee (SEP 1996) per paragraph {c} the bid bond a 20% is required.

However, the solicitation is budgeted at $250,000. Please clarify which amount we need to provide bid bond for?

USFS Response – Bid bonds must adhere to the proposed amount including options. See table included in 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee (SEP 1996)

RFI #3 – Can we provide retrofit windows in lieu of new construction?

USFS Response – Yes, retrofit windows are acceptable so long as all specs are met.

RFI #4 – Do you require a specific name brand window or can a non recognize manufacture be submitted as long as the specifications are met?

USFS Response – A non-recognized manufacturer (US), is acceptable, if the specifications are met.

RFI #5 – The SF 1442 lists the due date and time as 06/21/2023 at 1300 PST, but on the description page of Sam.gov (https://sam.gov/opp/48572cac6e524825beccdb5b449b8995/view), has different dates. The dates below are listed:

USFS Response – Proposal due date and time are confirmed as 06/21/2023 at 1300 PST.

RFI #6 – During the job visit at the Mammoth Barracks we pinpointed 5 holes on the siding.

Please confirm we will not be responsible for filling these holes?

USFS Response – Contractor will not be responsible for fixing the holes in the siding.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFI #7 – We understand the ranger station windows are optional. We need clarification as we noticed two of the windows in the first-floor look like they are already vinyl meeting title 24.

Would these windows be replace too to match finish other windows?

USFS Response – The two existing windows that meet title 24, will not have to be replaced if they match the new replacement windows to installed in other areas.

RFI #8 – We noticed the siding on the range station is loose and broken in some areas. Please confirm we are not responsible for the repairs?

USFS Response – Contractor will not be responsible for repairing the loose siding.

RFI #9 – We were not be able to visit Crestview due to road closure, please provide photos?

USFS Response – See attached photos.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .