Purchase Order DOLB07JE20298
- Not listed
- This purchase order award, issued on October 1, 2006, represents a federal contract with a ceiling value of $3,000. The contract was awarded without a set-aside designation, indicating it was competed among all eligible contractors without restrictions based on business size or status. Performance of the work is based in San Francisco, California. The contract utilizes a purchase order instrument under other pricing arrangements, which suggests a relatively straightforward procurement...
- This purchase order contract, awarded on March 23, 2006, with an ultimate completion date of April 22, 2006, carries a ceiling value of $2,000. The contract was issued without a set-aside designation, indicating it was awarded through open competition. The procurement utilized a purchase order contract type with other pricing arrangements, suggesting a streamlined acquisition approach for this relatively low-dollar requirement. While specific details regarding the prime contractor, soliciting...
- This federal contract award represents a Purchase Order issued on September 1, 2007, with a ceiling value of $4,000. The contract was awarded on a competitive basis with no set-aside designation applied. Performance of the work is located in Mill Valley, California. The contract utilized "Other" pricing methodology, suggesting a non-standard pricing arrangement distinct from firm-fixed-price, cost-plus, or time-and-materials structures. The contract was scheduled for ultimate...
- This purchase order, awarded on October 18, 2005, represents a firm fixed-price contract valued at $4,348.00 for performance in Simi Valley, California. The contract was awarded without a set-aside designation, indicating it was competed among all eligible contractors. As a purchase order mechanism, this contract likely represents a smaller, routine procurement rather than a comprehensive service or development effort. The firm fixed-price structure indicates that the contractor bears the risk...
- This federal contract award is a purchase order issued on October 1, 2004, with a ceiling value of $1,630.00. The contract does not utilize a set-aside designation and operates under other pricing arrangements. The contract was scheduled for ultimate completion on September 30, 2005, providing a one-year performance period for the delivery of goods or services. Without information regarding the specific products or services, funding agency, prime contractor, or subcontractors, the precise nature...
- This federal contract award represents a purchase order issued on September 13, 2005, with a ceiling value of $2,112.00. The contract was awarded without any set-aside designation and utilized other than standard pricing mechanisms. The ultimate completion date was established as September 30, 2005, providing approximately 17 days for contract performance and delivery. The relatively modest contract value and short performance period suggest this purchase order addressed an immediate, tactical...
- This federal contract award represents a purchase order issued on November 27, 2006, with a ceiling value of $4,725.00 for performance in San Diego, California. The contract was awarded without a set-aside designation, indicating it was competed among all eligible contractors. The contract type and pricing structure suggest a straightforward procurement vehicle for specific products or services required by the contracting federal agency. The modest contract value and purchase order structure...
- This federal contract award represents a purchase order issued on February 25, 2005, with an ultimate completion date of March 27, 2005. The contract carries a ceiling value of $1,026.00 and was awarded without a set-aside designation. The contract type and pricing structure indicate this was a straightforward purchase order transaction, though the specific products or services procured are not detailed in the available award information. Without additional documentation regarding the...
- This federal contract award is a purchase order issued on September 1, 2006, with a ceiling value of $3,000. The contract is designated as a small business set-aside, restricting competition to qualified small business entities. The work is to be performed in San Francisco, California. The contract employs other pricing structures rather than fixed-price or cost-reimbursable arrangements typical of larger federal procurements. While the specific products or services to be delivered are not...
- This purchase order, awarded on September 19, 2008, with an ultimate completion date of October 19, 2008, represents a contract vehicle with a ceiling value of $9,040.91. The contract was processed through ratification and was not issued under any small business set-aside designation. Performance of the work is located in Alameda, California. The condensed timeline and modest contract value suggest this is a straightforward procurement for supplies or services required on a short-notice basis....
This purchase order, awarded on October 16, 2006, represents a relatively modest federal procurement with a ceiling value of $4,778. The contract was executed without a set-aside designation, indicating it was awarded through open competition. Performance of the contracted work or delivery of goods is specified to occur in Monterey, California. The ultimate completion date of October 19, 2006, suggests this was a short-duration engagement, likely for a specific, time-sensitive requirement. While specific details regarding the prime contractor, funding agency, and the exact nature of the products or services procured are not provided in the available award information, the contract's small dollar value and brief performance window indicate it was likely a routine operational purchase or service requirement. The "Other" pricing type classification suggests the pricing structure did not conform to standard federal pricing methodologies such as firm-fixed-price or cost-reimbursable arrangements. Additional documentation, such as the original solicitation or purchase order detail, would be necessary to provide comprehensive information about the contractor performing the work and the specific deliverables under this procurement.
Mod # | Description | ReasonForModification | Federal Obligation | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Funding Only Action | $725 | 2/12/07 | |
| Not listed | Not listed | $4.1k | 10/16/06 |